Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins Hospital

October 17, 2007 - One Response

AFTER YEARS OF TELLING PEOPLE CHEMOTHERAPY IS THE ONLY WAY TO TRY (‘TRY’ THE KEY WORD) AND ELIMINATE CANCER, JOHNS HOPKINS IS FINALLY STARTING TO TELL YOU THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY.

Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins Hospital:

1. Every person has cancer cells in the body. These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable quantity.

2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person’s lifetime.

3. When the person’s immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.

4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors.

5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.

6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastro-intestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.

9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and
complications.

10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.

11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply.

CANCER CELLS FEED ON:

a. Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful. A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color. Better alternative is Bragg’s aminos or sea
salt.

b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soya milk, cancer cells are being
starved.

c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.

d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains, seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment. About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).

e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high caffeine. Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer-fighting properties. Water-best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.

12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines become putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.

13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat, it frees more enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body’s killer cells to destroy
the cancer cells.

14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Florssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the body’s own killer cells to destroy cancer cells. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death – the body’s normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.

15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit. A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.

16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.

PLEASE READ:
1. No plastic containers in micro.
2. No water bottles in freezer.
3. No plastic wrap in microwave.

Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don’t freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Castle Hospital was on a TV program to explain this health hazard.

He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body. Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food. You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. Paper isn’t bad but you don’t know what is in the paper. It’s just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper. The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.

Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.

Proof Positive for Throwing Away Your Vitamin Supplements

August 9, 2007 - Leave a Response

According to Science Magazine, animals on synthetic vitamins dropped dead long before the animal on no synthetic vitamins.

The Vitamins in Medicine warns against doses in excess of 10mg of vitamin B1 because they were not metabolized and were excreted unchanged in the urine.

The American Academy of Applied Nutrition found that animals fed enriched bread lived 10% shorter lives than those feed un-enriched bread.

The New England Journal of Medicine cited that babies of women who consumed 10,000 I.U of vitamin A from supplements has a 240% increase in birth defects.

The New England Journal of Medicine showed that men taking beta-carotene supplements had an 18% higher incident of lung cancer, more heart attacks and 8% higher overall death rate.

These same men who were taking vitamin E supplements had more strokes from bleeding in the brain.

A four year study at Dartmouth showed no colon cancer protection when taking synthetic anti-oxidant vitamins.

New England Journal of Medicine reports that elderly people taking a synthetic multi-vitamin did not benefit with their complaints of muscle weakness and physical tiredness.

British Journal of Chemistry and Physiology reports that ascorbic acid (vitamin C) injections did not improve intestinal disease.

A study at the University of California at Berkeley noted that administration of synthetic vitamins to dogs caused a worse state of health than pure starvation.

Journal of Nutrition noted that sterility occurred in rats given synthetic B1 vitamins. It also often causes hyperthyroidism according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Of the most perilous deceptions is the passing off on a gullible public, phony, synthetic vitamins and preaching that THE BODY DOES NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. At the very best, synthetic vitamins can function in the body as a DRUG OR PHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; certainly not as a natural nutrient.

Real vitamins must come from food. Go with the ONLY vitamin company who has ALWAYS used food based nutrients and not synthetic vitamins. YOUR HEALTH DEPENDS ON IT!!

The Lure of Synthetic Vitamins

June 7, 2007 - Leave a Response

Most chemist maintain, molecule by molecule, synthetic vitamins are identical to natural vitamins. The isolated factor of each may be identical, although newer information challenges this belief. Man-made synthetic supplements are a combination of some of the separate factors, never the whole complex of synergistic factors found in nature. The whole family of B, C or E vitamins is known as a “complex.”

Synthetic vitamins  may cause improvement of certain conditions for a short time but the whole complex goes even further. It is now believed that the “unknown” co-factors found in natural vitamins, not found in synthetic forms, act as catalysts which make the vitamins more effective. The reason why synthetic vitamins are so popular is because they are easier and cheaper to manufacture in a lab from petroleum product than to grow and harvest from crops.

Are the vitamins you take causing deficiencies?

Research indicates that synthetic vitamins may actually cause nutritional deficiencies. When you take a synthetic vitamin, it needs the co-factors normally found in the whole food, in order to complete its action. If they are not in the foods you eat, it will draw the co-factors from your body. You may feel good for a while but when the co-factors run out, you will begin to feel worse. The prolonged action of the synthetics imitates the action of drugs; they over-stimulate rather than feed your body. Science does not even come close to duplicating nature. Many illnesses, pain and suffering are the result of your dietary ignorance.

Synthetic vitamins will never have the effects of natural vitamins simply because they are missing many parts of the whole complex.

Give your body what it needs, it’ll make everything else from that. To sustain good health, your cells must have all the elements they need to perform the jobs of growth and tissue repair in the body. Your body does not need hundreds of vitamins and minerals in order to maintain itself. It seems that every month a new miracle vitamin is being touted. Each cell in your body requires certain nutrients to maintain its basic metabolic function and keep healthy. The body will manufacture everything else from these basic building blocks.

A word about labels

Many consumers are confused by the labels. Many labels say “Natural” or “Food based” or “Organic”. “Natural” is a term used very loosely. Many things are natural (e.g. oyster shells) but they may not be ideal for human consumption. Food based simply means that it started with a food product (such as a carrot) but the rest of it was synthesized in a lab. And if the carrot was organic, then they can also add the word “organic” to the label. One way to tell if a product is synthetic is to use the word potencies. In reality, high concentrations have nothing to do with potency. A 10,000mg capsule of Vitamin C may not necessarily be potent at all! Remember, you will never see those concentrations in nature. They simply do not exist like that except in a bottle manufactured in a lab. Eat food, not chemicals.

Spend You Hard Earned Money on Natural

May 2, 2007 - Leave a Response

Did you know that most vitamins on the market claiming to be natural only have to be 10% natural to make this claim?!? It is critically important you learn to read labels to assure receiving your money’s worth.

A product can even be 100% organic and not be natural at all. To be called organic a molecule need only have at least one carbon atom. This definition broadens the range from acceptable food sources of animal and plant tissues to raw materials including coal tar and wood pulp (yum!). Many synthetics are made from coal tar derivatives. That’s the same stuff that causes throat cancer for tobacco smokers. Don’t you think your body can tell the difference? Surely your cells can make a distinction between food and coal tar, just as a fish know the difference between natural and synthetic sea water.

Many so-called natural vitamins have synthetics added to increase potency, or to standardize the amount in a capsule or batch. In addition a salt form is added to increase stability of the nutrient (i.e. acetate, bitartrate, chloride, gluconate, hydrochloride, nitrate, succinate). These terms added to the vitamin name helps you identify synthetics.

Generally speaking, you can identify natural by reading the label and finding a listed ‘food” source such as citrus, yeast, fish, vegetable, etc. If a chemical is listed or the source is blank, it is synthetic.

The synthetic vitamin dealers would like you to believe that there’s no difference between natural and synthetic, because synthetic vitamins are much cheaper to make and mean much more profit for the company. They are not efficiently utilized in the body as natural supplements due to the “dl” factor and the lack of complete families which include all surrounding micro-nutrients.

It’s your choice!

Dr. Ulan

Shocking Video about Psychiatric Testing

April 3, 2007 - Leave a Response

Psychiatry: No Science, No Cures

Target Nutrition Workshop

March 28, 2007 - Leave a Response

If you can only attend one of my workshops this year…this is it.

If you have tried and failed to handle your health concerns such as weight problems, allergies, fatigue, chronic pain, chronic infections, repeated colds or flu, migraines, headaches, insomnia, PMS, menopause or a host of other conditions, then come to my workshop and learn about a health improvement program that will finally reveal the “missing piece” to solving your health condition.

Nutrition Response Testing is PAINLESS, POWERFUL and PERSONALIZED! Only SAFE, NATURAL and EFFECTIVE tools are used for treatment such as whole food supplements and/or herbs with dietary and lifestyle changes.

During this special workshop I will be doing Nutrition Response Testing for FREE so if you have a friend, family member or loved who has a health condition bring them along.

Wednesday – April 11th – 6:00pm

Seating is limited

Contact Sarah 489-1544 to reserve your spots today

Hundreds of people are feeling better today. Isn’t it your turn?

Muscle Testing Proved Solid

March 15, 2007 - Leave a Response

Hello all, Dr Faler ND here! I came across this very exciting piece of research and thought I would share it with all of you. I use Manual Muscle Testing as a diagnostic tool and it has proven invaluable in my practice. It allows the Doctor to communicate with the nervous system of the patient directly and gather the necessary information. I am posting only the abstract as it contains the summary of 30 pages of data. If you would like to read the whole article it was published in The Journal of Chiropractic and Osteopathy and can be found on their website for free. Enjoy!

Take Care,

Philip W. Faler ND

On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review
Scott C Cuthbert and George J Goodheart Jr.

Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2007, 15:4 doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-4

Published

6 March 2

Abstract (provisional)

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production.

Introduction

A body of basic science and clinical research has been generated on the manual muscle test (MMT) since its first peer-reviewed publication in 1915. The aim of this report is to provide an historical overview, literature review, description, synthesis and critique of the reliability and validity of MMT in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems.

Methods

Online resources were searched including Pubmed and CINAHL (each from inception to June 2006). The search terms manual muscle testing or manual muscle test were used. Relevant peer-reviewed studies, commentaries, and reviews were selected. The two reviewers assessed data quality independently, with selection standards based on predefined methodologic criteria. Studies of MMT were categorized by research content type: inter- and intra-examiner reliability studies, and construct, content, concurrent and predictive validity studies. Each study was reviewed in terms of its quality and contribution to knowledge regarding MMT, and its findings presented.

Results

More than 100 studies related to MMT and the applied kinesiology chiropractic technique (AK) that employs MMT in its methodology were reviewed, including studies on the clinical efficacy of MMT in the diagnosis of patients with symptomatology. With regard to analysis there is evidence for good reliability and validity in the use of MMT for patients with neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction. The observational cohort studies demonstrated good external and internal validity, and the 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were reviewed show that MMT findings were not dependent upon examiner bias.

Conclusion

The MMT employed by chiropractors, physical therapists, and neurologists was shown to be a clinically useful tool, but its ultimate scientific validation and application requires testing that employs sophisticated research models in the areas of neurophysiology, biomechanics, RCTs, and statistical analysis.

 

High Cholesterol, Not Worth the Treatment Cost

March 12, 2007 - One Response

Hello again readers, Dr. Faler ND here. Recently I have been thinking quite a lot about cholesterol and the 50% of the American population who have “elevated cholesterol”. A few weeks ago someone very close to me was told that he needed to go on Lipitor, a cholesterol lowering drug, also known as a statin drug. He was told that his cholesterol was too high and that the drug was required every day from now on to ensure his safety. Now I have studied these drugs extensively and I know the effects that they have on the body. First let me say there is no such thing as a side effect, they are all effects. The only reason they call them side effects is because they are other than what was intended. They are effects, just as significant as the therapeutic effect. Now I am not a drug hater. There are times when they are an absolute blessing and life saver without a doubt. However, I do have a problem with routine prescribing of long term maintenance chemical agents. I have seen enough in practice to know that it does not improve health but in fact slowly whittles away at good health by causing numerous imbalances in the body. The problems of maintenance pharmaceutical treatment as a means to improve health is an in depth topic for another day but in short the problem is this. Maintenance pharmaceutical treatment attempts to control the body rigorously through maintained chemical manipulation. Applying this level of control over the body for a long period of time assumes that we know better than nature how to balance our complex system. Anytime I have witnessed man attempting to control nature for a long period of time, I have witnessed a mess. Good health comes from living within the laws of nature, giving the body the tools it needs, maintaining the body through exercise as well as maintaining integrity, quality relationships and a meaningful sense of purpose.

So cholesterol and what to do about it has been on my mind lately and this is what I have found. First, what is cholesterol? Is it some foreign enemy to the body to be kept in check at all costs? No. Cholesterol is essential to human life. Every cell in your entire body is made from cholesterol. Every hormone you produce to run your body is built from cholesterol. If you were to stop eating cholesterol completely, a vegan vegetarian diet, your liver and intestines would produce more, to supply the needs of the body. So according the American Heritage dictionary cholesterol is defined as the following:

“A white crystalline substance, C27H45OH, found in animal tissues and various foods, that is normally synthesized by the liver and is important as a constituent of cell membranes and a precursor to steroid hormones. Its level in the bloodstream can influence the pathogenesis of certain conditions, such as the development of atherosclerotic plaque and coronary artery disease [cholester(in), former name for cholesterol (CHOLE– + Greek stereos, solid + –IN) + –OL1 (so called because it was first found in gallstones).]”

Cholesterol is a fatty substance found in the animal products that we consume as well as in very small amounts in plant substances. Again, here the FDA has created confusion, allowing producers to label plant products as having zero cholesterol, when in fact they do contain a small amount, and again I say why mislabel our foods. (See previous article “Trans Fats, Just a Little, Lie.”?) Cholesterol is used in the body to manufacture the outer wall of every cell of the body as well as to produce the hormones that regulate the functions of the body. Cholesterol is also used to produce myelin, a fatty coating on the outside of each nerve to ensure rapid and accurate transmission of nerve signals, like the outer covering of electrical wires. So obviously, cholesterol is quite an important substance to the body and essential to human life. Conversely LDL cholesterol, one form of cholesterol, i.e. bad cholesterol, has also been shown to deposit it self on the walls of arteries causing the formation of a hard thick substance called cholesterol plaque. Over time, cholesterol plaque causes thickening of the artery walls and narrowing of the arteries, a process called atherosclerosis. This process increases the chances of several serious cardiovascular disorders, namely heart attack and stroke. Herein lies the dilemma. Cholesterol is a double edged sword essential to life and also part of a dangerous process. So, because there is cholesterol in the plaque found in artery walls, an elevated serum concentration of cholesterol is assumed to be the cause of the plaque. As you will see this is not necessarily the case. In fact the cholesterol deposits itself in artery walls as a part of a repair mechanism for small tears in the lining of the walls of blood vessels. So perhaps looking further into how to reduce the number of micro tears in artery walls would provide a more effective solution.

Ok, now we have identified what cholesterol is and that it is both essential to life, as well as a contributing factor to atherosclerosis and perhaps a risk factor in cardiovascular disease. Next let’s take a look at a cost benefit analysis of elevated cholesterol and its related risks and the pharmaceutical treatment currently used by ten million Americans to lower cholesterol and the health risks that come with that. Which is more dangerous? Does one ensure longer life? Does either detract for the quality of life lived?

Let’s first have a look at the connection between elevated cholesterol and CHD, coronary heart disease. Following is some data from a fifty year long study that is still running today, the Framingham Heart Study. (Reference 2)

Framingham Heart Study

In the Framingham Heart Study, as many as one third of all coronary heart disease (CHD) events occurred in individuals with total cholesterol <200 mg/dL. Considering that the average U.S. cholesterol level is approximately 210 to 220 mg/dL, almost half of all heart attack events and all stroke events that will occur in the United States next year will in fact occur among individuals with below-average lipid levels. For this reason, our research group has sought in our large-scale prospective epidemiologic studies to understand better other markers associated with cardiovascular risk.

Did you read that?!!… “Almost half of all heart attack events and all stroke events that will occur in the next year in the United States next year will in fact occur among individuals with below average lipid levels.” Furthermore, the graph above, particularly the curve labeled No CHD, shows that 60% of those people, with out CHD, are well above the so called safe cholesterol levels and have had no CHD. This data represents information gathered from a large population over the course of 26 years and from what I can see indicates little to no link between the level of total cholesterol in the blood and CHD. So, why then are10 million Americans on statin drug therapy to lower their cholesterol? If a statin drug were good for your health, if they somehow boosted your health while minimizing this already small if at all existent risk, then I would say it is a good idea to have 10 million Americans on an indefinite prescription for them. Statin drugs will in fact lower your serum cholesterol, but according to this data from the Framingham Heart study this in no way makes you safer or ensures a decrease in likelihood of CHD and it certainly does not improve your health. In fact statin drug therapy is quite detrimental to your health. Prior to beginning this therapy the prescribing doctor must check the integrity of the patients liver, run liver enzymes. If the liver shows no sign of pathology then this new drug, liver burden, can safely be started. Now six months into the therapy the liver enzymes, a measure of liver integrity, must be again checked and so on every six months as long as a person takes one of the statin drugs. So if the liver must be watched so closely during therapy with statin drugs, would it be safe to say that statin drugs are known to detract from the health of the liver, to deteriorate the liver?

Several other common side effects of taking statin drugs are muscle pain, loss of memory, headaches, nausea and abdominal pain. Statin drugs have also been shown to not only do their job of inhibiting the liver from producing cholesterol, but also to decrease the production of the Co Q 10 a known beneficial and requiered nutrient for the well being of the heart.

In review, the data shows that cholesterol levels in the blood greater than 200 mg/dl are not significantly correlated or linked to CHD or strokes. Meanwhile ten million Americans are receiving indefinite treatment with one of the statin drugs in an attempt to lower their cholesterol and prevent CHD. Cholesterol lowering agents, statin drugs, which are harmful to the liver, cause muscle pain, mental confusion, nausea and abdominal pain, will indeed lower the cholesterol in your blood stream by preventing you body from producing it but there is no evidence that this improves your health in any way. Seems to me that taking a liver toxic drug to lower cholesterol in the blood when we have 26 years worth of data that shows there is little correlation with “elevated cholesterol” and CHD is a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Simply put there are no known health benefits to taking a statin drug and there are known health costs, so why would you take this substance? I would not.

So what do you do to prevent CHD? Well first things first, take responsibility for your health. If you want even mild assurance of a healthy heart you must personally take some action to make that happen. Start by consulting a natural health care professional, a licensed Naturopathic Physician or well trained Chiropractor. Ask them about reducing inflammation in your body, this is the real silent killer! Earlier I mentioned that cholesterol plaque on the artery walls are a part of a repair process for small tears in the inner lining of arteries. Perhaps rather than trying to suppress cholesterol level we should look to reducing inflammation and irritation in the lining of arteries and there by prevent their tearing and the resultant plaque build up. Talk to you natural health care professional about how to take steps to invest in your health and well being and then follow their recommendations. Let your natural health care provider help you identify the health burdens in your life then follow his/her instructions to eliminate these burdens. Take a long hard look at your personal health economy and decide where you can cut some costs such as, poor diet, bad habits, and negative thought patterns. Add in some new health income, quality food, increased vegetable intake, exercise, good relationships, find ways to increase the joy in your life, this will be good for your heart. As I have said, life offers no guarantees but we can work to increase likelihoods. Your first step is to seek the professional guidance of a licensed natural health care provider. The great thing about natural health care is that there are no bad side effects only improved health and better quality of life.

Well until next time, think positive, eat well and live, laugh and love.

Your Friend In Health,

Philip W. Faler ND

 

 

 

Free Health Seminars

March 5, 2007 - One Response

For you, your family and others you care about With natural health improvement expert and member of The Foundation for Wellness Professionals™ Dr. Kevin Bond

Digestive Health – March 5th, 6:00pm
What are the secrets to a healthy digestive system? Learn how to get rid of Heartburn, Acid Reflux, Irritable Bowl without drugs or surgery.

Stress and Fatigue – March 19th, 6:00pm
How to recognize and handle the causes of stress naturally. Including: ADD/ADHD Anxiety, Panic Attacks and Brain Fog

Headaches/Migraines – April 2nd, 6:00pm
Did you know 45 million Americans have chronic headaches Learn about the different types and causes of headaches and migraines.

Women’s Health – April 16th, 6:00pm
Women’s health is a growing concern for millions of Americans, come and learn the latest and most effective natural solutions for: PMS, Mood Swings, Hot Flashes, Menopause and Hormonal issues

Seating is Limited – Reserve your seat today – Call (509) 489-1544

All seminars will be held at: 307 W. Francis Ave Spokane, WA 99205

The Foundation for Wellness Professionals™ (FWP) is a not-for-profit organization. Members of FWP are highly trained natural healthcare professionals who devote their time as motivational and keynote speakers, perform Wellness Days blood pressure checks, spinal screenings and deliver educational workshops at no charge on health-related topics in their local communities. FWP members are in great demand to speak at corporations, women’s associations, bookstores, health food stores and fitness centers. To check Dr. Bond’s availability for your upcoming event call (509) 489-1544.

 

 

 

Vaccine Seminar in Seattle

March 5, 2007 - Leave a Response

The Vaccine Seminar

With Dr. Tim O’Shea, author of The Sanctity of Human Blood

This presentation will focus on:

– The new flu shot

- New Vaccines: AIDS, HPV, Rotateq

- Mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde

- Natural vs. artificial immunity

- Germ theory of disease

- Autism epidemic

- History of vaccines

- The human genome

- 2007 mandated schedule: 68 vaccines by age 18

- Ingredients of vaccines

- and much, much more

Mar 24, 2007

Clarion Hotel SeaTac – 3000 S. 176 St — 206 242 0200

8 am – Reservations: please call 408.298.1800 or by email.

www.thedoctorwithin.com 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.